I saw the full version a while back - I always thought that, while he was obviously very affected by the experience, Lenny Henry took the easiest, most comforting way out when he just bought a new house for the family and got out of there. More or less how most charity works - we send in our money and then move our minds to less troublesome thoughts.
Better than not sending money though right? And whatever you think about Comic Relief - Lenny Henry has certainly been pretty committed to the cause for some time...
Er - it depends. I'm not of the opinion that any type of charity is better than no charity at all. In my model of the world, aid of any form has the potential for a negative net impact. Even if any money is better than no money - saying "surely any money is better than no money" doesn't really do much for arguments that these messages and the type of aid people give could be improved. I'm not arguing that Lenny Henry was disingenuous in any way, just that the lesson that viewers take away might not be the right one.
Because the consequences for human welfare involved in questions like these are simply staggering: Once one starts to think about them, it is hard to think about anything else. (Lucas 1988, On the Mechanics of Economic Development)
I'm a Consultant at Oxford Policy Management, where I save babies every day. Obviously nothing written here necessarily represents the views of Oxford Policy Management. I am barely sure it even represents the views of me.
I used to be an Economist in South Sudan. Hence the silly subtitle. Roving Bandit is a reference to Mancur Olson, not because I think I'm some kind of badass. I'm also a big fan of experiments.
4 comments:
I saw the full version a while back - I always thought that, while he was obviously very affected by the experience, Lenny Henry took the easiest, most comforting way out when he just bought a new house for the family and got out of there. More or less how most charity works - we send in our money and then move our minds to less troublesome thoughts.
Better than not sending money though right? And whatever you think about Comic Relief - Lenny Henry has certainly been pretty committed to the cause for some time...
Er - it depends. I'm not of the opinion that any type of charity is better than no charity at all. In my model of the world, aid of any form has the potential for a negative net impact. Even if any money is better than no money - saying
"surely any money is better than no money" doesn't really do much for arguments that these messages and the type of aid people give could be improved.
I'm not arguing that Lenny Henry was disingenuous in any way, just that the lesson that viewers take away might not be the right one.
Instead he should be addressing the structural governance constraints to improved livelihoods in Kibera?
Post a Comment