05 December 2013

Awareness raising for development: nonsequitur of the day

only 30% [of EU citizens] see education as a priority [for development] ... There is still a lot of awareness raising we need to be doing in the education sector. (says Global Partnership for Education staff member)
I'm trying to keep the snark to a minimum these days but this was too tempting. Personally I think it is appalling that the EU public doesn't see improving the welfare of economists and consultants as the top continent-wide priority, and there is a lot of awareness raising to be done to help citizens appreciate just how under-appreciated economists are.

More constructively, call me crazy but maybe just maybe it should be developing country citizens who are setting the development priorities rather than EU citizens?

And finally, "raising awareness" is actually already on the development #bannedlist so just stop it. If you want to sell or market your product or idea that is fine, but would you ever say that Coca-Cola are sensitizing people or raising awareness about their great taste? Exactly. What you are talking about is advertising or marketing. And to go out on a bit of a limb - isn't it possible that the very language of "sensitization" and "awareness raising" actually helps to reinforce the unhelpful narrative of expert foreigners with all the answers showing up to tell the ignorant locals what is what - and thereby contributing to the general lack of attention paid to the opinions of the poor? Wooooah, I might have betrayed a bit of exposure to SOASian critical theory there. But language matters.  
"if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought ... Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." Mr. Orwell, 1946

1 comment:

Education-south said...

You are right and the GPE has been very keen on promoting itself and this is very counterproductive. Last report is "The value added of GPE " http://www.globalpartnership.org/value-added-paper-2013/ Oh my god ! Mac Donald is doing impact evaluation of the Big Mac. However, I don't know what development aid is good for, but I have a sense of what development aid is doing when it is missing, have a look at the graph and position of Togo and Tchad who did not receive education aid for years and whose completion rate does not progress compared to others. But some countries have received a lot of education aid without much progress. This has to be evaluated rigourosly in 2015, deadline for Education For All. and I would suggest that we, bloggers and citizens do this independently.

To start this, a more rigorous "sense" (would not call it evaluation) of what beeing part of the Global Partnership for Education does vs not beein part of this multilateral initiative does (though not rocket science), have a look there : http://varlyproject.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/benchmarking-tools-for-universal-primary-education/
This said not receiving education aid is liaised with bad governance (a kind of punishment by donors), so the effect of not receiving aid might just be the effect of bad governance, though Governance indicators (Transparancy International Index) was introduced in the model :) . So finally to concluce yes development economists are a bit under estimated as there is little variation in their findings, very few thinking on models that would fit development countries and a new generation of independent economists is most welcomed ! So thanks for your blog.

Post a Comment